After reading the case (copied below the questions ) answer the following questions:
1. Who's rights and needs (which two parties) did the courts seek to balance?
2. What new standard did the court set in this decision?
3. Based on this new standard, are random searches OK?
The following synopsis was taken from the New Jersey V T.L.O. (1985) Supreme Court decision.
We are faced initially with the question whether [the Fourth] Amendment’s prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures applies to searches conducted by public school officials. We hold that it does . . .
To hold that the Fourth Amendment applies to searches conducted by school authorities is only to begin the inquiry into the standards governing such searches . . .
Students at a minimum must bring to school not only the supplies needed for their studies, but also keys, money, and the necessaries of personal hygiene and grooming. In addition, students may carry on their persons or in purses or wallets such nondisruptive yet highly personal items as photographs, letters, and diaries . . . There is no reason to conclude that they have necessarily waived all rights to privacy in such items merely by bringing them onto school grounds.
Against the child’s interest in privacy must be set the substantial interest of teachers and administrators in maintaining discipline in the classroom and on school grounds. Maintaining order in the classroom has never been easy, but in recent years, school disorder has often taken particularly ugly forms: drug use and violent crime in the schools have become major social problems . . .
How, then, should we strike the balance between the schoolchild’s legitimate expectations of privacy and the school’s equally legitimate need to maintain an environment in which learning can take place? . . .